§ 12-609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime.  


Latest version.
  • A.  For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime:

    1.  Involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment; or

    2.  Was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one (1) year, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the detriment of the defendent.

    B.  Evidence of a conviction under this section is not admissible if a period of more than ten (10) years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, whichever is later, unless the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. Evidence of a conviction more than ten (10) years old, as calculated herein, is not admissible unless the proponent gives to the adverse party sufficient advance written notice of intent to use such evidence to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to contest the use of such evidence.

    C.  Evidence of a conviction is not admissible under this Code if:

    1.  The conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of the rehabilitation of the person convicted, and that person has not been convicted of a subsequent crime which was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one (1) year; or

    2.  The conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.

    D.  Evidence of juvenile adjudications is not admissible under this Code.

    The court in a criminal case may, however, allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused if conviction of the offense would be admissible to attack the credibility of an adult and the court is satisfied that admission in evidence is necessary for a fair determination of the issue of guilt or innocence.

    E.  The pendency of an appeal from the conviction does not render evidence of that conviction inadmissible.  Evidence of the pendency of an appeal is admissible.